Tomorrow's world

So, go on then, which of you cricket experts, men who understand betting, wise guys from around the nets - which of you nominated Pakistan and Sri Lanka to reach the World T20 final? Or Tillekaratne Dilshan to be man of the tournament?

Oh, I see, you sir. Well, well! Was it your Tarot cards, your crystal ball or the tea leaves that gave you most help?

Because it sure as hell was not studying Wisden and using your long knowledge 130 years of cricket history that led you to pick out the way this world event shaped up.

Not that I am complaining. This version of the game produces matches of the highest quality, individual performances beyond belief and the speed with which the overs rip by means that a man has just one chance to prove his worth.

It shows up the non-thinkers, sorts out the inadequate performers and reduces those with poor nerves to quaking jelly.

I am convinced that cricket has found its future in T20 and that if the various boards keep their heads it can lead the way back to prosperity anfd stability. There will be room for Tests and space for limited overs internationals but in this tournament we have seen proof of the lesson learned many years ago by another game.

When I first reported snooker in 1972 the final of the world championship lasted a week. It had no sponsor, no money and very little public admiration.

Now the final lasts two days and still makes fascinating viewing and an unforgettable experience for the spectator.

I will not earn an OBE for telling the die hards at Lord's that cricket should follow the example of snooker but they could do a lot worse.